Pearl
Biological monitoring can be tricky in some cancers. For example, in myeloma, is the best marker to measure disease IgG levels, M-protein, or MRD (measurable residual disease)?
And how do we use these markers to adjust treatment - how much change in MRD levels or M-protein equates to a need to change therapy? We donβt have a good answer for this right now.
In April 2024, the FDAβs ODAC committee supported the use of MRD status as a surrogate endpoint in accelerated approval for myeloma studies. This has the potential to dramatically shape myeloma trials and treatment but weβll need to see how it shakes out in future clinical trial design.
The use of MRD as a biomarker has opened up a new question about autologous transplant, historically a very common treatment of myeloma.
Today, myeloma is not curable, even with transplant, but if we can achieve a deep and durable response with available off-the-shelf therapies, do patients truly need to go to transplant?
One argument is to still collect stem cells (because it gets harder the longer they are on marrow toxic drugs), but to hold off on transplant in favor of continued therapies that offer the same or better outcomes with less toxicity risk.
A lot more to come in myeloma in the future! |