Pearl
If you ask an experienced oncology pharmacist that specializes in BMT if they would undergo an allogeneic (allo) transplant, you might be surprised to hear many say no
The reason is because they have seen a lot of GVHD, graft versus host disease, a challenging post-transplant complication
GVHD occurs when T cells from the donor think the recipient's tissues are foreign cells that aren’t supposed to be there - and like a good army, they start fighting them ⚔️
And with all things in medicine, it’s nuanced - GVHD has a good 👼 and a bad 👹 side
The bad side is that it causes all kinds of problems in both the acute and chronic stages after transplant - it can impact almost anything in the body and is responsible for most of the high rates of morbidity and mortality associated with this treatment
So controlling GVHD is the key for an allo transplant to be successful, but control is the key word here because we don’t want to completely eliminate it
Weird, right?
We actually need a tiny bit of it because when those donor cells recognize the recipient cells as foreign, it can also recognize malignant cells
And when it sees those, it does the same thing - attacks them, which leads to better disease control and lower rates of relapse
Patients with no GVHD relapse at a higher rate than those who do have it - this is why we don’t want to use an identical twin donor to transplant for malignant diseases, they won’t have any GVHD and therefore are more likely to relapse
For many decades we used the same basic backbone to prevent GVHD, methotrexate and a calcineurin inhibitor - it was marginal at best with half of patients still getting GVHD
As we were researching new donor types (specifically haploidentical, or a 50% match donor), a new prophylaxis regimen was studied, called post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)
Now you might be wondering why we call it PTCy and not just cyclophosphamide but the ‘post-transplant’ part is pretty important
When you are learning about transplant, there are some cardinal rules, and one is that you don’t mess with the stem cells 😅
And one part of that is no chemo after stem cells are given. There is even a rest day built into the conditioning regimen the day before stem cells (called day -1) because we don’t want anything messing with their mojo
PTCy is given after the stem cells are infused
When this was being studied and talked about it was quite the eye opener - why are we giving chemo AFTER stems cells? Won’t it kill or damage them?
Turns out, no
Cyclophosphamide is an interesting drug. It’s an old school alkylator developed from mustard gas in the 1950s. In addition to anticancer activity, it has potent immune suppression effects, making it an effective agent in many non-oncology diseases, like autoimmune ones.
Its mechanism in preventing GVHD is still being understood but it has to do with blunting the effect of alloreactive T cells (which are the cells that identify non-self cells) while encouraging (and potentially increasing) the regulatory T cells which are suppressive of alloreactive T cells.
The overall effect is an immune suppressive environment
This is the reason we avoid steroids before PTCy - we don’t want to further mess with the immunosuppressive environment, so you’ll have to think outside the box for nausea/vomiting
Doses of PTCy are 50 mg/kg on days 3 and 4 after transplant - if you haven’t seen chemo doses used in transplant you might be shocked
Typically, we’d be worried about myelosuppression with such high doses but we aren’t because the stem cell infusion will fix that
The dose limiting toxicity of PTCy is actually cardiac ❤️ - it can cause acute congestive heart failure and myocardial necrosis and typically occurs in the first 10 days
Not a lot of exciting science reaches stem cell transplant, but PTCy is definitely one that has moved the needle. If you’re curious, read the results of the BMT CTN 1203 study. |